Nov 28, 2012
I’ve always wondered about the benefits of doping in professional sports. Once, I read about a journalist who decided to dope just to find out if it really was that dramatic at providing performance increases, and not only was he stronger, have significantly more endurance, but he also seemed to start reverse aging (age spots on his skin started to disappear). Indeed, the reported benefits of doping are staggering. Even an average guy like me could probably ride my bike over 100 miles a day for days in a row without real problems.
Lance Armstrong is once again in the news for doping. Many of us have been pretty sure that he’s been a doper all along, but the man “has never failed a drug test” so we just let it go. For the particular drugs we’re talking about, there is no real way to test if the drug is in someone’s system. Instead, they test for other indicators. In the case of EPO, they test for a blood hemocrit level above 5.0 (whatever that means). Basically, if you tested every professional racer, there is a good chance that 90% of them have hemocrit levels at 4.8 or 4.9. Their argument is that they are not cheating, even though they are cheating, just doing it below the level that they would get called out for it. Instead, they argue that they are just keeping themselves level with the rest of the playing field.
A few years ago I’m sure I argued that core HR was dead, and talent management was dying with nothing to take their places. Let’s face it – core HR functionality has not changed in a decade and Talent has been a bit of a bust because all we’ve done is automated the old crappy stuff. Today, I’m not going to argue that HR technology is dead. I’m going to argue that the playing field is now level. Now I want to see who is going to perform, and who is going to get left behind.
If we look around the HR marketplace, there is really good reason to be excited. I’m not talking about new functionality in core or talent, but I’m talking about how everyone is creating new user experience, and doing it in different ways. If we look at Fusion versus Workday versus SAP/SF Employee Central versus ADP Vantage versus (all the vendors who are pissed they got left off al already too long list), the theory and design of the experience is totally different. What we assume about our company’s employees and managers will drive a selection, not what functionality works for us.
We are no longer in the era of “do I want PeopleSoft position management, or SAP’s?” I actually get to make a decision that is based on my culture and how I think they will best use the application. Do I have a bunch of engineers, or do I have a bunch of management consultants? Do I have machinists or perhaps finance guys? I’m finally at the point where customers and culture are the things that are important. I finally get to make decisions based on company strategy, workforce and culture.
Functionality is dead because it is a level playing field – but HR technology is one of the most exciting places to be in a really long time.